In partnership with

Free email without sacrificing your privacy

Gmail is free, but you pay with your data. Proton Mail is different.

We don’t scan your messages. We don’t sell your behavior. We don’t follow you across the internet.

Proton Mail gives you full-featured, private email without surveillance or creepy profiling. It’s email that respects your time, your attention, and your boundaries.

Email doesn’t have to cost your privacy.

Good morning. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed a crypto-specific fundraising framework with two clearly marked lanes: up to $5 million over four years for a startup route, or up to $75 million in a 12-month period for a larger fundraising route. Read the SEC announcement.

Illustration: the rulebook may be changing, but the fine print remains.

That is the headline. The important footnote is that Regulation Crypto Assets is a proposal—not a final rule, not a permission slip, and not a reason to throw confetti at your cold wallet. The SEC is accepting public comments through October 20, 2026. See the proposed-rule page.

Why it matters

For years, crypto projects have argued that the old securities-offering playbook fits blockchain networks about as gracefully as a fax machine fits a group chat. The SEC’s proposal tries to build a purpose-made bridge for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets.

The smaller route would require tailored disclosures. The larger route would add financial statements and ongoing reporting. Both would remain under the securities laws’ anti-fraud and anti-manipulation rules. In plain English: simpler does not mean consequence-free.

There is also a proposed “safe harbor,” but it has more gates than a gated community. An issuer would need to complete—or permanently stop—the essential managerial efforts it promised, meet other conditions, and certify that status to the SEC. Only then could the relevant asset potentially stop being treated as subject to that investment contract. Read the SEC Chairman’s statement.

The caveat worth underlining

Congressional Research Service analysis flags an unresolved practical question: exchanges, brokers, and dealers could still face securities-law issues when they list or trade covered assets before those promised efforts end. Translation: this may make capital raising more legible, but it does not make the regulatory fog disappear on day one.

Bottom line

The SEC is testing a more crypto-native rulebook—one that pairs potential fundraising flexibility with disclosure and accountability. It is a meaningful draft, not a finished map.

That is your morning signal. Read the fine print before the rocket emoji.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading